What Really Happened: The 'Far-Right' Labels That Don't Add Up

History: Their Own Signs Told the Story - 'Not Far-Right, Just Right! 

4 to 5 min read

When Immigration Concerns Became 'Racism': The Governments Political Weapon! 

Since when does opposing mass immigration make you 'far-right'? Yet, a year ago, Keir Starmer took things in that direction! After the Southport attacks, protesters who expressed themselves were vilified — many were arrested under special powers for just standing there doing nothing. Of course, we have to appreciate that element of racist, vandals and thugs who rightfully were arrested, but tarring everyone with the same brush is unfair. 

Immigration, Morality Drama and Racism

In December 2024, with Reform UK overtaking Labour in the polls, Starmer quickly jumped on the 'stop the boats' bandwagon, promising to tackle immigration! We should be honest with ourselves, anyone can take an example of racism and play the moralist with it. Real racism is vile and it's not as common as the many things people prescribe it to be - so why weaken it with silly accusations? Other expressions of racism come across as a political game, or social weapon. We saw the 'racism gameplay' used on the majority of leave voters during brexit. Before all this, Harry and Meghan’s Netflix show accused the entire UK itself of being a systemically racist country. Keep it for the actual racists. 

The Missing Evidence: Where's the Proof Behind These 'Far-Right' Claims? 

Holding anti-immigration views or voting to leave the EU is not adequate proof of anyone's standpoint on what race might be, or if it is problematic or not. Neither is it a hint of intellectual inferiority. Comparable to remain voters, leave voters were publicly labelled across the media as having fewer qualifications, living in rented accommodation, or council housing, and being less travelled. Yet, years later, they were blessed covid keyworkers! 

When it comes to racism Labour MPs insisted police should shelve valid investigation into Islamic grooming gangs stretching across many council estates. This was to avoid being seen as ‘racist’. Anti-racism politics continued, alongside pressures for a nationwide investigation into those very gangs which identified failings you should look into. 

Absolutely, racism is comparable to a weapon. In reality, it's not black and white, inter-ethnic communities face their own long standing problems too; some racial tension garners less media attention. Ever read about racism in Leicester and Birmingham? The conflicts between Black and South Asian communities shows another perspective on racism. The news broadcasted these clashes and claimed most of which were of a cultural and religious nature - racism language not utilised in the BBC (BBC News, 2022). 

Going Back in Time

One example of historical British racial conflicts go back to the Britons and the first English Anglo-Germanic tribes, as far back as the fifth century. Different language, culture, religion and genetics, left an impression they were separate races, given how they derived from different ancestral gods. South Asian hostility toward Black people is another expression of humans beings being unpleasant to one another (Gillespie, 2021).

Admittedly, we can agree that the vocal fervour and conviction of some protesters may have came across intimidating; passionate or political chanting can appear aggressive when it is not necessarily the case, like when holding an English flag because football hoologans and ethno-nationalists have done so in the passed. 

Be that as it is, name calling, however; as in branding regular people unfairly as the aforementioned. It's similar to the non-crime hate incidents for which people can face prison! 

Too much tarring was going on and most people are still holding a tainted brush. Many protesters in Westminster generally distanced themselves from any far-right ideology and criminal activity, because it was repulsive to them, as you'll see in this honest video below. 

Liars Pretending to Fight a Moral Cause? 

Virtue signaling always adds salt to the wound. It refocuses the optics framing self-promotion: for example, seeing our Prime Minister playing the saint in the very place where those poor girls were murdered was immoral. Why? The BBC and other mainstream news headlined 'Not Terror Related'. Starmer denied all knowledge of the guilty party, despite Nigel Farage openly asking, 'What are they not telling us?'

This Prime Minister knew at the time that those murders were inspired by Islamic radical ideology! That's what he was not telling us! Even when mainstream BBC news portrayed the 'suspect' as being 'Welsh' because he was born in 'Cardiff'. 

Regardless, officers recovered an Al-Qaeda training PDF, terror related internet searches on his computer and poison. How is that not radical or terror related? The evil wretch was known to authorities and no-one stopped him. The people had valid reason to protest because there was a lot to be said, but instead many ended up arrested!

The Cover-Up Continues: What Other Facts Were Hidden?

In the Westminster video above, we see protesters, mostly mothers and grandads and so on, indiscriminately herded into police vans! The news, with political help, smeared the lot of them: Westminster certainly was not facing an EDL or NF march! 

An inspection of the police response to the public disorder in July and August 2024 concludes:

No evidence existed to prove any deliberate plot by any group; the actual trouble makers in other protests were done by local people fuelled with anger. They found outside individuals, influencers who kindled public disaffection. They added fuel to the fire with inaccurate information. 

Before 2024 most of the detained rioters and protestors had no previous arrests for disorder-related offences. Police arrested nearly 150 children, some as young as 11. Motives for rioting and protesting were diverse, including fears of poverty, biased policing, as well as concerns surrounding increased immigration. Issues the country voted against repeatedly only for it to be ignored. 

Previously, before these protests, Keir Starmer publicly bent the knee in support of Black Lives Matter, whose vandalism swept the globe. 

The Dangers of the Left

Ultimately, we know that pandering to any particular foreign demographic for votes in an election is discrimination against all the others, questionable at least. It is questionable that no national inquiry was undertaken on the grooming gangs! For years newspapers, and now, online whistle blowers, claim postal voting fraud was directly linked to the Labour party and the Islamic community. Watch the video below! 

Dishonesty and Using Race as a Weapon

In a televised broadcast, Keir Starmer admitted to knowing the details of the Southport case at the time - his excuse: it was ‘not right’ to release them to the public at the time. The police released those details just three months later, in October. This was long before the trial. So, why did Keir Starmer, a successful legal expert respond the way he did?

My Conclusion

Starmer has avoided answering questions about the non-far-right, those peaceful participants in the protests who were made out to be the EDL. Why? People suffered or died in jail for tweeting on social media. Pensioners lost winter allowances, the government demonised those who are anti-immigration and then banned useful workers from legally entering, such as carers for example. 

Starmer said women could have a penis until the law changed his mind. His premiership continued to free up prison spaces by releasing prisoners early. Of course, he replaced them with hundreds of innocent people found guilty of 'thought crime,' 'facebook posts they didn't like' or 'holding a placard'. Strangely though, if any lefty publicly ordered throats cut or openly yelled 'deff to the IDF' on stage at a televised concert, well...that  was not so bad. Maybe the plan was to make prisons a tad more Bingo and Werthers Original? 

References

BBC News. (2022). "Leicester and Birmingham Ethnic Tensions." Retrieved from [BBC News](https://www.bbc.com/news).

Gillespie, S. (2021). "Ethnic Tensions and Prejudices in the UK." *Journal of Ethnic Studies*, 12(3), 45-62.

HMICFRS (2024) Police response to public disorder in July and August 2024 (Tranche 2). Available at: https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publication-html/police-response-to-public-disorder-in-july-and-august-2024-tranche-2/#:~:text=The%20risk%20online%20content%20poses,content%20could%20contain%20vital%20intelligence. (Accessed: 24 May 2025).

Sproston, K., et al. (2018). "Educational Disparities Among Minority Students." *British Educational Research Journal*, 44(4), 679-695.

Amy Bradley is Missing: Vanishing From a Cruise Ship

Talking About Amy Bradley: A Netflix Shocker (Spoilers) 

3 min read 

A Cynical View Minus The Bollocks

Netflix paints the Amy Bradley case as a deep mystery, but, at the same time it is structured with a very likely outcome. 

The Boring Explanation is Most Likely

Not long after the Netflix show announces her disappearance it hurls in a local, someone quite familiar with the sea's current! Message being: 'We know where a body would wash up, none did,' computer imagery helped to convey their claim. 

We learn Mr and Mrs Bradley pushed to have all passengers grounded until their 23 year old Amy was found. Their request was denied. The staff did do something; a deep search after the passengers disembarked - it was to no avail. She had already left. Look, I know I'm being a tad boring here by saying she took herself off the ship - but why did she?

Sidestepping Netflix

I watched Alister Yellow Douglas, who was cleared by the FBI. The man spoke on YouTube in an interview. and he was very believable. Obviously, I think he is innocent of Amy's disapearence. He directly said Amy told him that her parents made her go on the cruise because she was gay! He said the comment confused him at the time, it would, and it struck a chord with me! The parents shared one bedroom; Amy, a grown-ass woman, also kept her own flat! What the fuck? 

You can see the prevailing waves of doubt across online discussion boards all centring in on Mum and Dad. Someone astutely asked, 'why did the Dad jump straight into a 'Amy is in danger' mentality simply because he didn't notice her that morning?' Netflix was right to bring them deeper into the narrative. According to long term followers of the case less was known about the parents and the dynamics until the show.

Netflix did allude to tensions during the trip of several occasions. Her sexual orientation was a significant issue and key! Her father sent Amy's ex-partner a negative three page letter to keep away! You see where this is going?

The Crux Of The Situation

Amy smoked, drank heavily, partied hard and became the 'life and soul' pulling in the attention. Why? Well... a witness on the Netflix show said on camera there seemed to be something driving Amy's behaviour, duh! 

Of course, it screams rebellion rather than just having fun. If you're feeling pressured by people who want to change who you are, wouldn't you push back? You might want to distance yourself, you might want to self-medicate? Do you know what I mean? 

What Happened? 

Curaçao in the late 90s was known for drugs and trafficking. I looked it up. Amy had motive to leave the ship, be it a self-medicating thing or an act of defiance, a break from the cruise ship, we could compile a list. 

Tragically, this headstrong young woman walked right onto an unsafe island alone. The FBI had limitations with investigating because they were in international waters, jurisdiction was a barrier. A poverty of Intel hindered progress. 

The Outcome 

We can't rightfully dismiss the witness accounts and photographic evidence that sprung up years later. The FBI analysis concluded it was Amy in those sexualised images. Overboard theories lost credibility. 

Netflix very strongly suggests Amy Bradley survived, eventually imprisoned in a guarded lifestyle. I must confess my love of documentaries. Here's another blogpost based on a Netflix documentary. Netflix love to playfully take viewers on a journey, briefly deceive them or go the scenic route, but this is different. A trafficked victim can face multiple forms of abuse and control - drugs, threats, and if Amy has children they could be used as leverage against her. Netflix is dealing with an ongoing, sensitive case.

That's the reality! A young woman caught between identity and family expectation needed to take a break but she was taken. The real mystery isn't what happened to Amy Bradley, as such. It's about how many other people disappear in similar ways, how we can push our loved ones away, our human nature to put self over other. It's heart breaking! The horrors of human trafficking mean we have to watch out for each other. Every herd has its predator waiting. 

What I reckon...

I have no idea if Amy Bradley is still alive now. Apart from the monsters who took her and their twisted circles, who does? When I wrote my Madeleine McCann blogpost I read Europol and US documents on trafficked children - life expectancy was greatly diminished for them according to data. 

We would all like to see Amy found alive and quickly restored fit and well. Sadly, if we go on the nature of these things the most positive outcomes become more like wishful thinking. Then again, people do defy the odds! 

Anyway, remove all those  assumptions we have of human trafficking, the hear-say and speculation, and it simply leaves us with a strong woman who walked away. Is it a shock anyone might want to escape their claustraphobic homophobic family cruise? 

It's so very sad. Look after yourselves, watch out for your own. Keep safe!

Who Would Manipulate the McCann Story?

THE DARK SIDE OF HUMANITY: EVIL IN HIGH PLACES?

5 min read

DISTRACTION IN THE MADELEINE MCCANN CASE? 

Disclaimer: this post covers unpleasant themes, discretion is advised. 

There are theories that Madeleine McCann somehow lost her life inside apartment 5A of the Ocean Club complex, Praia da Luz. Of course, we don't know if this is true or not. You might have read similar speculative blogs that explore medication mishaps or a physical accident, but whatever occurred on May 3rd, 2007, it was not necessarily a silent kidnapping or a bodged burglary. 

Why? Well, there was no sign of a struggle, no reports of noises you'd expect like panicking or screaming children, nothing was kicked over, no fingerprints, nothing was stolen, in fact, the siblings slept through everything—this was a strange disappearance, not a proven abduction. Yes, we have heard it all before! 

Imagine, if you can, that the official narrative was a planned damage control intervention. That would mean the abduction story was designed to protect something, be it a group, a person or even knowledge. But, if this was true, who would take control of the narrative? Media spin. 

Definition from Oxford Languages:

Spin-doctor: a spokesperson employed to give a favourable interpretation of events to the media, especially on behalf of a political party.

WHAT WAS GOING ON IN AND AROUND THAT PART OF PORTUGAL? 

I chose to withhold names and sources to avoid doxing, but there were very powerful people with property in the area at the time. One particular gentleman had connections to the UK establishment and was later alleged to have sexually assualted children. 

We must understand that a huge child trafficking network existed across Casa Pia with UNESCO ambassadors, politicians, and establishment figures involved. It was operating since the 1960s. According to this U.S. State Department report (2023), Portugal continues to stand out as both a destination and transit point for child trafficking. 

CHILD TRAFFICKING INVOLVES NETWORKS BUT IT CAN BE OPPORTUNISTIC

Out of the many Nigerian children who are trafficked to European countries, most are forced into prostitution to generate money. However, Europol here state how online methods also provide means to operate this disgusting underground crime. 

CHILD ABUSE CAN ALSO COME FROM OUR FINEST

Even after Operation Yewtree's string of arrests of child molesters from the entertainment industry, Huw Edwards, (who likely covered it) got off so lightly for his own indecent images of children. We can't forget the televised gibberish from Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Epstein, Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre. This kind of human predatory sickness could easily have spilt over the likes of Praia da Luz from the echelons of Portuguese society. 

THESE CIRCLES INTERLINK

The numerous Jimmy Savile, Gary Glitter and Rolf Harris documentaries across the internet and streaming services paint a strong picture of how sick and degenerate rich and famous individuals can be! Such 'upper crusts' of society are often seen on good terms with at least one monarch or a reputable business-type. Criminal Rings, paedophile circles, people must be in the 'know' to be involved. 

After watching the disgraced morning TV presenter, Philip Schofield, ranting in his televised expo in the wild, I was left with an unpleasant afterthought. You see, he shamelessly pushed his victim yarn of betrayal, explaining it with a bitter venom. It made me appreciate the immense narcissism found with the types of celebrities like the ones above, all who had an exposed sex-type problem. Does the entertainment industry attract psychopaths or egotists? 

Don't get me wrong; I could mention outstandingly wonderful human beings who are movie stars, like Keanu Reeves or Steve Buscemi, but I won't. 

WHEN A SPEAKER SPEAKS FOR OTHERS

A British spin-doctor joined the Madeleine McCann scene. Once he was a disaster reporter for the BBC, leaving many of us Brits scratching our heads at the 'special treatment' the McCanns were getting compared to other families in similar predicaments. Gerry and Kate became involved with this powerful circle of PR media wizards who acted as their mouthpiece. The McCanns dined with one of the family members in his private villa nearby. 

What's striking is the idea of a random drifter was kidnapping a child in an area like Portugal. Think of all the network of powerful child molesters who usually order these crimes; they would know they did not request the abduction of the missing child. The motives for them supporting the parents is limited. It could be altruistic or self focused. Our actions come from motive, but also character. 

FINE MORAL CHARACTER? 

The spin-doctor worked for a crisis manager, and PR, an individual who manipulates perceptions for a living.  Part of a high status circle and family. Known as a shadowy and elusive figure, but above all his PR company never supported families of missing children before Madeleine McCann disappeared. Described as a star in the 'new culture of public relations and marketing in politics, business and journalism'. However he is not a saintly character. 

He supported Live Aid, the UN's Sustainable Development Goals and Comic Relief. This is charity and seen as admirable. Charity work is not a measure of a person's goodness; Jimmy Savile gave a fortune to charity. 

PROVEN CONNECTIONS:

The MP celebrity cook: Queen-knighted, Praia da Luz villa owner, contacted McCanns weeks after disappearance

Casa Pia Network: convicted ambassadors, politicians, UNESCO officials running child trafficking operations in Portugal since the sixties.

The PR support for Gerry and Kate McCann was most likely not altruistic and selfless because we saw no intervention for the likes of Hannah Williams (2001) Charlene Downes (2003) Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman (2002) or Shannon Matthews (2008). Why? Is this one circle covering for another? 

THE DRIFTER 

In 2020, German Prosecutor Hans Wolters said, authorities 'actually have findings that suggest' the German high profile paedophile monster we've all been hearing about 'is Madeleine McCann's murderer'. 

We all heard the claims of robust evidence but, five years later, the same prosecutor changed his tune: there's 'no prospect' of charges being brought to the accused. Yet again, this is another strange way to behave. It was as if they planned to convince us all they had proof which will undoubtedly prosecute the actual culprit. It was nonsense. 

Are monsters in broadcasters still targetting kids? 

My Conclusion...

We don't know what happened exactly, but if we can recognise a tree by its fruit what should we call this tree? For all we know, the PR mouthpiece and media work was not an altruistic gesture. We can only speculate because investigations have failed for the last couple of decades and it's a cold case. 

This means I can't accuse anyone of harming Madeleine McCann, which is why I have left out names. I'm sharing my suspicions that things remain intentionally hidden from the world. When vile trafficking circles interlock we see more degradation of a society. If ever we see a world where it is common place to hear of men stealing children in our neighbourhoods, that should be the mark of our failure!

The BBC paid a chauffeur to collect and drop off children for the likes of Savile. For me it's not one person its a systemic failure, a social disease, perverted sadism in the pockets of hierarchical classism. It preys on anyone, including the less fortunate. Sadly it can be from bottom up: children sold by their own kin into prostitution.