The Real Story Behind Fallen Angels

What They Don't Want You to Know About Angels!

Rephrasing the Same Themes Across Time and Culture

After researching this esoteric stuff for months, I can't unsee what I've discovered. Fair enough, that was a bit too dramatic, but the idea of immaterial spiritual beings watching us is creepy. We know it has roots in quite a few ancient cultures. Even while pulling incredibly stupid faces at yourself in the mirror, that sudden thought of an invisible observer stops you in your tracks. I mean, it would be horrible if dead family members could see us goofing around like neanderthals, having special time with yourself or even just having a poo. The would make the medium blush.

Characterizations Shape Us

All those old Gods and characters from the Bible could be put into a Mortal Combal type beat em up, choose the likes of Prometheus, Odin, or the Fallen Angel Lucifer—all of them have played a part in shaping the Western and European psyche and have cross over similarities. The Christians rebranded many of the older gods as angels. They can't be both god and angel can they? Speaking from a social-evolutionary point, certain Germanic gods are considered to be based on real tribal leaders or warriors, like Yngvi-Freyr or Woden for example. Cross cultural polynation might show mesopotamian influence of Greek or Canaanite pantheons.

People from different times and cultures described the same type of scary entity known as watchers—disappointed father-in-laws. Let's have a butcher's at the Akkadian Igigi and the Grigori (both of these terms mean Watchers) from the Book of Enoch. 

The Igigi and the Watchers: Exploring Ancient Mesopotamia:

These things pop-up in texts that predate every major religion, before any questionable history or theology down the park! That's me trying to plug other blogposts, badly at that. So yeah, Igigi (watchers)  are in the Atrahasis epic, dating back around 3,800 years. Yeah, I agree it could all be nonsense, just cultural storytelling. Agreed, the ancient Atrahasis had a very believable and quite ordinary coracle boat, unlike the later embellished vesion known as Noah (which is a nickname) he built a sodding-cruise-ship-sized-zoo! We are talking about pre-flood times which is roughly around 7000 years ago. As well as preserving truth, the human race talks a lot of shit. 

Jobs or Divine Duty? 

Originally, in the clay stories, Igigi oversaw nature. Not like foremen or stockroom assistants down the local warehouse, but subordinates to the higher divinities. Basically, these winged watchmen were given tasks of ‘doing the weather’ and mundane earth palaver. It was an Akkadian explanation for natural forces. Anyway, as it goes, they wanted to get rid of their labour, and so, seeking the same freedom their masters enjoyed, they staged the first rebellion! 

This Was Early Workplace Competition

The creation of us humans came as a result of a particular god's life energy: the word for the energy coincidentally translates into the ancient word for word 'rib' cool isn't it? Yes, Adamu was given life blood from the goddess, Ninti (woman of the rib/life blood). So, anyway, Adam or Adamu, homo-sapiens relieved the Igigi of their burdens, which ultimately diminished their status; ambition reduced them to lesser spirits like sprites or that eithies boy band Bros—I hated them. 

Another Perspective 

At some point, the people must have been sacked and lost that divine role in the world. Why? Well, none of us can command the weather now can we? We might try. Perhaps instead the ancients meant it was our global domination or something? It's fact, our knowledge built kingdoms, cultivated, grew institutions of learning. That's more logical than being natural forces like methane emissions, sorta. 

Related Gods and Crossovers

Crossover between the pagan plural and the monotheist singular are quite striking. It's as if the children of El and the Gods are almost related? Strange, well, nah—not really is it? Look, I'm not calling for talk show DNA paternity! I mean, have you noticed how most angel names end with E and L? Raphael, Gabriel or Michael for example, even Angel! Why? El was the chief God, and he must have put it around a bit. Angels are believed to be based on pre-monotheistic gods. Did I say that already? 

Priest classes of Israel merged EL with their God Yahweh leading to some theological dragon ball z fusion. Angels, like the older Igigi were seen as hidden influences, coincidence? Akkadian culture integrated across to the Jewish-Babylonians! 

Spooky Supernatural Ties to Culture and Belief:

We’ve all seen the horror films where a demonic force might molest a woman, like that old 70s movie ‘the Entity’—based on a true story! This kind of thing happened in William Friedkin’s Exorcist, which was also inspired by true events and coincidentally, incorporated an Akkadian demon called Pazuzu! In reality, it was a loose base at best. 

You know that feeling when something feels wrong? Well. . . it's not just like checking for lumps in the swimming baths, no; in antiquity, such feelings would've been seen as some kind of evil spirit. All depicted as nefarious winged people, giants, and so on, to be precise, ‘invisible presences’ fits the religio-cultural standard more accurately. Police don't arrest horned, hooved, black winged demons, well, fair enough.

The Watchers of the Book of Enoch:

In the story of the watchers, Azazel and Samyaza convinced two hundred watchers into a pact to corrupt humanity through sleeping with women, and teaching their following generations all kinds of forbidden knowledge—a bit of a Promethean gift. Fuck me, how did they negotiate that? Maybe this wasn't literally angels humping? It's got the same spiritual thing as discussed earlier. You can't expect to corrupt an already corrupt humanity by introducing vigorous sex practices, if that was the case, the mass media would be elite special forces! We would corrupt them. Dirty bastards. 



Shagging in this context represents a profound unity of the fallen spirit and the human. I have no idea who dreamt this shit up? Chronicus Masterbatus? The idea reflects the Catholic idea of possession where the body can serve as a vessel. See it's coming back around to mothers sucking ominous things in fiery places. So lets say the fall of the angels is purely ignorance for those beings. Possession is supposed to be like having your worst impulses amplified by an outside force. The people made forbidden unions with lesser beings, angels. Doesn't that sound amazing? Bit like the UK government forbidding double handers from fairies. 

'So, Mum, Dad, this is Azrael, Angel of Death!’

The watchers tried to dominate us all by sabotaging the natural order and becoming lords of humanity. Well, it's a story of ruin. A bit like sabotaging your teachers class by introducing weed and truancy to the kids. These effects are still observable with our world leaders, especially when you look at our education levels. 

The Limit of Human Knowledge:

The philosophy of mind is golden! It often milks quantum physics and neuroscience, but it's hit a huge wall: none of them can tell us what a unit of consciousness even looks like, nevermind prove it as an actual thing! We are all conscious, see what I mean about education levels? Modern academics have suggested consciousness might be part of the quantum field. Ancient hellenic and semitic minds often held beliefs of it emanating from a higher source, or an entire spiritual domain. Even though the academics are still looking for a way to correctly define what consciousness is, new and old perspectives both hold meaty philosophy on the subject. 

Words and Meanings Across Text:

𒀭𒄑𒉡

The above word is Igigi in Akkadian cuneiform. It also means watchers as well as referring to divine overseers.

ἐγρήγοροι

This word means egrigori in Old Greek, also meaning watchers.

עִירִין (Irīn)

This word for watchers is Aramaic because the original Book of Enoch, was written in this language. It can also mean 'those who are awake'.

Don't give me any credit I just Gemini'd it. 

In Genesis, the Hebrew term for the serpent is nachash. Dr. Michael Heiser’s research argues the serpent of the garden of eden was not a literal snake, but rather a fallen rebellious six winged fiery angel called a Seraph. This is a modern bloke, he gets paid for this. 

Giants of an Evil Seed? 

The Nephilim were the descendants of those toxic, parasitic family relationships. The fathers are incorporeal low lives with axes to grind. Nephilim means giants or fallen ones, common enthusiasts tend to indirectly hint at giants or Nephilim being present in mesopotamian tablets and art. That's more aligned with ancient alien stuff. This is a pre-flood era legend. Nephilim for me are men of renown and called giants because of their reputation! 

Let's face it Canaan was full of such men at that time, but was that because they suckled on the nipples of demon milk as babies? Could the ruinous essence of a fallen angel seep into the mammary based nutrition of offspring? We could ask science or philosophy. I wouldn't because, these people were more than likely demonised by other human beings. 

But Are You Sure They Weren't Really Giants? 

If they're not literally ridiculously tall, then what? Not one legitimate giant skeleton has ever surfaced without a mysterious disappearance story! Let's piss on this bonfire, some ancient humans in particular enjoyed the unfair advantage of so-called 'celestial knowledge,' including metal works and weaponry. The bible says the Nephilim became men of renown. Look at Goliath, he was a giant, but a more conservative scriptural measurement of 6’5” has been found. Relatively six-five was huge back then given the average man has been more like 5'6" for centuries! Little man syndrome. 

Okay, I'm on a roller, stick with me: do tall populations of people exist? Yes, we can see many noticeably tall individual in the Netherlands and especially with the African Dinka people. Ha! They don't hold any fallen angel, or Nephilim connotations because no one ascribed such things to these groups! That means, ancient time story tellers biased in their tall tales against tribes with lanky people they disliked. This might put the matter to bed for some of you.

Giant Correlations of Renown

The early bronze age began in the Middle East in 3300 to 2000 BCE, which is exactly the time Azazel taught the local warrior people near Mt Herman, (Canaanites) how to make metal weapons! If we add this to the fact that scientists have estimated 2900 to 2500 BCE as an accurate date for a legitimate flood event of the area it shows the theme that inspired the creation of these religio-political narratives! Come on! 

We can safely say these Canaanite people were most likely always depicted as the Nephilim! I mean, a lot of these writings are just bad mouthing the neighbours!

My Conclusion...

There’s a ton of these 'fall from grace' stories from ancient themes; many hold little resemblance to how we modern folk think or see the world. That's not an assertion that there's nothing supernatural surrounding us in the aether, the war offices, in those high places. I did the dramatic thing again, look at this:

Maybe it's that dark unwelcoming threshold you don't want to walk through in that creepy house? I guess it's quite like those timeless proverbial good and bad angels persuading you from each shoulder: it comes down to how we align ourselves. I think I've lost the plot. 

Real or not, we still borrow from this complete bullshit for stereotypes and tropes. I would argue Darth Vader, Count Dracula, and so on, all these iconic characters are kissed by these old influences somehow. That's some groovey-ass-deep shit right there. Okay, maybe not. 

The Evil of Hierarchy: Hidden in Plain Sight

When Do Dangerous Traits Become Leadership Skills? 

Let’s Reflect on the Psychopath

When you hear the word 'psychopath,' you probably picture Jack The Ripper, Ted Bundy or Anthony Hopkins doing his famous fava beans scene. But what if I told you that psychopathy doesn’t always fit that image? In fact, high-functioning psychopaths are all around us—teaching in classrooms, CEO's running companies, Priests leading congregations, MP's working in government or Soldiers being heroes on the battlefield. It was supposed to be surprising, a crescendo or something, but then our doctors receptionist came to mind, my kids school headmistress and my wife's nurse, then you have the DWP and those TV licensing loony tunes. Psycho's are as common as kpop fans these days!

More often than not these individuals exhibit traits like charm, fearlessness, and emotional detachment, which make them uniquely suited for leadership. When people with psychopathic traits are diagnosed these days it's usually with antisocial personality disorder instead; it covers sociopathic and psychopathic behaviours. But still, the question is, why do we trust them so easily?

The Charm of High-Functioning Psychopaths

Psychopathy exists on a spectrum. At one end, you’ve got violent offenders. At the other, you’ve got individuals who can navigate society without breaking the law while seeming to maintain strong emotional intelligence or insight. They seem know themselves well.

According to psychologist Robert Hare (1991), psychopathy is characterized by traits like superficial charm, manipulativeness, and a lack of empathy. I know this description screams Ant and Dec, but in the right context, these traits can look a lot like admirable qualities.

Take the business world. Studies show that 4-12% of CEOs exhibit psychopathic traits, compared to just 1% of the general population (Boddy, 2011). Why? Because the same traits that make psychopaths dangerous—boldness, risk-taking, and the ability to stay calm under pressure—are exactly what corporate boards look for in a leader. Does that supply and demand model work with entertainment? Why not? Look at those people!

Think about it, who better to make tough decisions or navigate high-stakes environments than someone who doesn’t feel the weight of emotional consequences? This is where the chips fall in society. Who else will trash hotels and put demands on producers?

Psychopaths in the Classroom, Church, and Boardroom

It’s not just CEOs who benefit from such psychopathologies. You’ll find these individuals attracted to education, religion, law enforcement, and even entertainment like everyone else:

1. Education

Senior teaching staff, particularly in competitive institutions, often operate in environments that reward ambition and control. A study by Gliebe and Moss (2019) found that manipulative and assertive behaviors are easily mistaken for leadership in academia. These traits help some rise to the top—but they also create toxic power dynamics.

2. Clergy

Religious leaders wield immense trust and influence, which can be exploited by individuals with psychopathic tendencies. The Catholic Church abuse scandals revealed how some clergy members used their positions to manipulate and exploit others (Doyle, 2018). A façade of morality can mask a darker reality. 

However, it must be said that paedophilia and psychopathy are totally different things; paedophilia is a sexual attraction to children of a certain age. Realistically, we know overlaps exist like, well, I don't want to think of an example, instead, imagine a freshly roasted dinner with succulents soft steamy pork and an array of delicious...there you go. 

3. Law Enforcement and Military

Professions like policing and the military attract people with sought after fearlessness type traits and an ability to detach. While these qualities are essential in high-pressure scenarios, studies show that law enforcement professionals are twice as likely to exhibit psychopathic traits compared to the general population (Krakowski, 2019).

4. Celebrity Culture

Actors, musicians, and influencers thrive on attention. Psychopathic traits like charm and narcissism blend right in with the kind of industries where charisma is currency. Hollywood scandals, from the 'casting couch' to PR cover-ups, are rife with examples of power being abused by those who can effortlessly manipulate public perception (Glenn & Raine, 2014).

Why Do We Trust Them?

So, why do we fall for psychopathic people? The answer lies in human psychology. Studies show that we’re wired to trust confidence and charisma (Hogan & Kaiser, 2005). High-functioning psychopaths excel at projecting these traits, making them appear capable—even when their actions say otherwise.

As Jon Ronson explores in The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry (2011), our society regularly confuses psychopathic traits for ambition, resilience, or leadership. 

Ronson interviews psychologists and explores case studies, revealing how traits like charm and fearlessness make these individuals seem like natural leaders—despite their darker tendencies. The following years after Ronson's book was released in the UK, terrestrial television produced shows on the same subject with online psychopath tests for the public to take. The sociopath and the psychopath always makes compelling characters don't they? Nice is boring, sadly.

Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiment (1963) uncovered something more frightening than the anti social personality. Participants in his experiment were instructed by a figure of authority (a researcher in a lab coat) to turn a handle to administer painful electric shocks to another person (an actor pretending to be in distress) which was set up to gradually increase throughout the experiment.

Despite clear displays of the human suffering (screaming, yelling, pleading) most participants continued to comply with the cruel instruction of the authority figure, shocking the person to perceived dangerous levels. This showed an inherent tendency of regular people to trust and obey authority figures, even when doing so to hurt people! 

So, who was being sadistic here, there authority or the ones who applied the electric shocks? What does that say about regular people?

The Double-Edged Sword of Psychopathy

Not all psychopathic traits are bad. In fact, some can be assets. Bravery and focus under pressure can save lives in the military. Charisma can inspire action in business or politics. But when left unchecked, these traits can turn toxic. The key is awareness. By understanding how psychopathy manifests in trusted roles, we can better evaluate leaders and hold them accountable. After all, the line between a trusted leader and a manipulative exploiter can be dangerously thin. 

If we take the case of the child nurse, Lucy Letby, for example, who was found guilty for killing infants. We can see how arduous it was to reach a guilty verdict: however many flaws were uncovered in the trial and the medical evidence was questionable by a body of highly educated medics. Lucy Letby's psychiatric assessments showed she was not ASPD or psychopathic, but stressed from her dire circumstances.

Final Thoughts

Anyone, regardless of being deemed a psychopath or not can do terrible things. We know high-functioning psychopaths aren’t always the villains we imagine. In many cases, people high on the psychopathic spectrum are people we admire most — authority figures like our bosses, celebrities, teachers and pastors. 

But their success can come at a cost of having less empathy as opposed to raw cognitive intelligence. Understanding the roles psychopathy play in leadership can help us ask the right questions: Are these people in high places leading us, or manipulating us? Are we trusting them for the right reasons? So, the next time you admire a bold political leader, ask questions, are you seeing resilience or manipulation? 

Are your religious figures showing leadership or is it narcissism? Is everyone in your local authority showing guidance when you seek help or is there dominance? Do any people in your life enjoy the suffering of others?

References

Babiak, P, and Hare, R.D, (2006) Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: HarperCollins.

Boddy, C.R, (2011) Corporate Psychopaths: Organisational Destroyers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Doyle, T.P, (2018) Clergy Sexual Abuse Scandals and the Culture of Denial. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.

Glenn, A.L, and Raine, A, (2014) Psychopathy and Instrumental Aggression. In: K.A. Kiehl and W.P. Sinnott-Armstrong, eds. Handbook on Psychopathy and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.145-161.

Gliebe, S, and Moss, K, (2019) Toxic Leadership in Academia. The Journal of Leadership Education, 18(2), pp.1-9.

Hare, R.D, (1991) The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). 2nd ed. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

Hogan, R, and Kaiser, R.B, (2005) What We Know About Leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), pp.169-180.

Krakowski, M, (2019) Psychopathy and Law Enforcement. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(3), pp.383-398.

Milgram, S, (1963) Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), pp.371-378.

Ronson, J, (2011) The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry. London: Picador.