When 'Love Your Enemies' Gets You Killed: A Historical Reality Check!
The Brutal Truth About Turning the Other Cheek
4 min read
Jesus warned, ‘He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.’ We all know the phrase, along with the promoting peace, expressions like ‘turn the other cheek.’ Ironically, it was his apostles who were allegedly non-violent, they met violent deaths. Here's the brutal truth; it is the decision to do no violence that led to violent endings. Various historical examples of pacifism shows persecution.
How Is The Alternative to Peace Often The Most Peaceful Solution?
Those scripture-based beliefs and philosophies were not common among the Germanic Pagan tribes. In contrast, to non-violent ideologies such tribes valued loyalty to their warlord, honoured bravery in combat, and vengeance, for example. Piety to them was martial discipline and defending their people. They embraced war and readiness to fight became a deterrent. These people also enjoyed what money could bring instead of denying it and fortified themselves, eventually defeating their Roman oppressors they retained a peaceful way of life.
The Alternative to Aggression Does Not Always Bring Peace
Christian forgiveness painted a target on their backs. Why? Romans saw Christian defiance as dangerous rebellion. Not only were Christians seen as weak by Rome for forgiving those who beat them, but also considered to be noncompliant sophists (possibly like insincere apologists of today). To Romans, this behavior was unnaturally weak. In Acts, Stephen prayed for those who stoned him. It isn't all religiously themed; non-Christian pacifists were murdered like the Greek Stoics and Pythagoreans.
Changing Perspectives From Vikings To Christian Crusaders
Why did pacifists make such tempting targets? However, on a practical level it is right to say that viking families did benefit from plundering gold enriched monasteries. Buildings of plunder guarded by peaceful, unarmed monks who preached against wealth; religious tension divided cultural beliefs! Later, the dynamics totally changed with Catholic Crusaders slaughtering thousands of Christian Cathars for heresy—how does that even follow? The Cathars refused to fight back. 'Kill them all; God will know his own,' yelled a leading crusader.
Quite an Alien Way of Seeing Things.
From the outside, pacifism looks like voluntary martyrdom. Let's be real, if making a sacrificial point wouldn't work against an over the top global threat like an alien fleet, why use it against aggressive human oppressors?
In the end, didn't Christian warriors expose pacifism as not doable? Take Joan of Arc for example, or even Saint Derfel, are examples of Christians who killed in war, literally as contradictory as waterproof teabags or rainbow coloured camouflage. Is this just like sharing the Buddha's wisdom with football hooligans or rioters?
A Harsh Point
Yes, living by the sword could result with death, as Jesus himself warned, but peaceful submission didn’t spare many either! The Gospels all simply imply we shouldn't kill each other, but does that work? How can we love our enemies if it is so unhealthy to do so? Unless enemy love meant something else altogether; a way of expressing a love for the challenges they hurl at you? Maybe it's showing value or genuine interest in the words of our enemies? I don't know.
A.) Because those very enemies early Christian disciples were expected to 'love' were not interested in Jesus preachings. They all held various cultures and perspectives, often speaking languages unfamiliar to Jewish Aramaic or Hebrew, as we saw with St. Thomas's Kali worshippers who brutally speared him to death in India.
B.) Non-violence was not exclusively taught by Jesus Christ. It was commonly held by ancient Greek philosophers like Epictetus, Pythagorus and Socrates, as well as the previously mentioned Jewish groups, but also Romans like Cicero and Seneca.
I Guess That's It! My Conclusion...
In the end, very few appreciated the early pacifist. Over time, we reverted back to our warrior ideals that dominate to this day. Just turn on the news and see US and UK borders and military posturing shows that our reliance on the sword has not faded (well, it's all machine gun now). But, if none of us had resisted the Hitlers and Napoleons of this world it would have succumbed to cruel monstrous leaders many times over! Compelling champions like Charles Martel, the Hammer of the Moors, the RAF during the battle of Britain or the Ukrainians in their fight for their country: they all make the use of force a valid case!
What do you think?