What Everyone Ignores About Hulk

Hulk Character Development: Hero vs Monster | Evolution in Marvel Comics

5 to 7 min read

When it comes to comic book characters few are as iconic as the Hulk. That's because he's a green temper tantruming vandal. He was created by the comic book legends Stan Lee and Jack Kirby in 1962, but has made a few evolutionary changes since—his first colour was a creepy grey, and he had more in common with Wednesday Addams than The Avengers. But who is the Hulk today? What makes him such a compelling character?

The Hulk in a Nutshell

The central theme of The Incredible Hulk is contrasts, a copy and paste rebrand of Dr. Jekyll and Hyde. Likewise, we have the brilliant scientist: Bruce Banner, a man with a calling to understand the mysteries of the world and his contrasting counterpart, a super monster man with the IQ of rubber duck. An entire age of sage rage from this not so jolly green giant; he is a monster but he can't be seen as a victorian murderer, like what we see with the rage of Mister Hyde. He's a good monster, right? F*** off he is! 😂

The way Hulk/Banner interact within the confines of the same person can be interesting, but it isn't though is it? 

Bruce Banner's like the nerdy kid at school who is, to be fair, quite well mannered but boring. I get it, he is a reluctant hero because it means unleashing the beast (The Hulk). The odd bully would make the of mistake of pushing them until they'd go full-on toadlicking warriortard and kick seven barrels of shit out of them! 

Of Course The Monster is Angry! 

True, every male, from teenager to seniority felt it. All of us grimaced at his excruciatingly tightening confines, and those dangly greens, what a farmer would be proud of at the county marrow competition. Ruined. The trousers remained the same size around the crotch! They burst under a cruel pressure of body mass increase everywhere else! 

Issues With Himself? 

Hulk has beef with Banner because he's in proportion, if you know what I mean? The green drama is all an over compensating performance because he's insecure and threatened by Banner. Bruce Banner can charm and date a woman, even try it with Betty or Scarlet, that Black Widow. He can hold a conversation because of his superiour intelligence, while Hulk, is opposite. Purely for laughs we could speculate the rage monster thing is just a smoke screen protecting a very sensitive hulk. 

Hulk is a Monster (Within Editing Standards) 

Has his primordial savagery de-bowelled, decapitated, quartered innocent children, women or old people? Why have we never seen him covered in the blood of his kills? Chains of nutsacks strung around his neck? Why doesn't he practice territorial pissing or other primordial animalistic shows of dominance? He's only a vandal. He smashes stuff, then runs away from authority. 

Unlimited Power!!! 

The Hulk's power in print, is almost limitless! He's ridiculous strong, but what's insane, is he becomes more godlike as his anger grows! The bloke lifted a mountain and jumped across cities, but still, he never kills anyone! The movie versions dropped that nonsense. 

He S**T Himself! 

Hulk was bricking! However, he is still a prick, because the US military continue to struggle with him whenever he has a dramatic meltdown! The Hulk is like a selective natural disaster, but no danger to the populace, its purely economic damage to the property. 

Adding Some Perspective to this Monster Hero Thing

For a moment imagine this incredible sulk is factual. Get gritty, realistic. Hulk gets lusty, not worth thinking about. If he is a monster wouldn't he consume human flesh as opposed to munching on Shawarma with the Avengers? When you follow the logic of Billy Butcher in 'The Boys' the Hulk would stand out as another bullshit PR branded hero who isn't what he seems. 

What’s the Crack? 

What would truth seeker news report after he halves a man using only his bare hands before throwing the soggy meat at a pensioner walking her yorkshire terrier? That's the crux of it, when you look at a real rage monster properly. I doubt I'm alone here. Hulk has to be either one or the other. He can't be both! There is either a real monster there or just an expensive tantrum. 

The Green Monster is a Hero, now? 

Look, whenever an alien fleet rocks up, he plays his part and saves countless human lives. This is a eight foot off colour shit is actively choosing to help the army and support police after being a menace to them—he knows better! He's acting with intent. 

The writers should, in these scenarios, make this creature a controlled or manipulated monster at the very least. He can fall into being portrayed as a poorly designed accidental hero type monster. Ill defined. The pitbull will protect it's owners children by chewing the neighbour kids arm off. Hulk is a labrador. 

Bruce Banner and the Hulk remind me of my bipolarity, just by observing the shifts mood alone. I can almost sympathise with Bruce Banner! Bipolar rage is also a real danger and even though my skin and eyes remain unchanged: I wouldn't hurl a car at someones house! 

However, if I was a super villain-like enemy or a comic writer, I would make Hulk very angry with himself, promote self destructive tendencies and watch hulk smash himself to oblivion. The green guy could not save himself from self obliteration—his own gimmick is rage. Brutal. 

Even though Hulk's a fictional character, the issues he raises are very real. No they're not, no one smashes buildings down because they're put out. Well. . . maybe Adele. Why would we need to deal with a rage rescuer? A savage saviour? A primordial protector of people, it makes little sense. He's reduced to a muscular vandal with bad hair. How do we balance the need to protect society with the rights of a human being, cursed to be a walking maelstrom of power?

We might recognise that this quagmire is neither very good nor bad. We are led to pity Bruce Banner who lives as the tormented bearer of the guilt of smashing property and screaming at people. He's a carbon copy of Jekyll and Hyde, bugger me: it's time to do this properly! 

I Never Got His Appeal

In some ways, 'The Incredible Hulk' can be seen as a metaphor for some kind of human condition. That's why I never wanted to play as this character when I was a child: I much prefered Superman or Luke Skywalker. Anyone else really. I mean, who wants to pretend to be the hero with cognitive impairment? 

Bruce Banner's emotional struggles were a constant theme in that show in the eighties. At the end of each episode the poor bastard walked away, sad and alone, while the most upsetting piano outro music left viewers miserable. 

Be that as it is, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Many truths would escape the story of a mountain throwing rage monster, which is, I repeat, for all intent and purposes, framed as a superhero. In Age of Ultron, for example, the green dude rampaged the city; cars are crushed (all empty of course) and our intrepid hero, booted a police vehicle into two police officers with such an impact that should've killed them—that's my point. 

This Hulk bloke has the potential to be a dream character, but at the moment, he's pretty much either a badly designed hero or a cheap villain with muscles. He's an intellectually challenged He-Man. Make him a monster or give it up. 

 

DC Rebirth Superman Became More Archetypal!

The Superman and His Rebirth! 

5 to 7 min read

The General Character Concept

The man of steel on the big screen was iconic because of Christopher Reeves. There have been other actors since him, a few before, but he seems to be the one that stuck in our heads and influenced comic art in the 80s to the early 2000s. I prefer genuine conceptions to be honest, forgive me for being a pariah but Reeves gave us an over saturated, family friendly example of bad story telling, and he did that cheesey sodding grin!

General Impression...

This Superman in the DC Rebirth graphic novel series consists of an Action Comics run, as well as one from the Superman comics, they correspond well. We can see a gentle nod to the classic era Superman and those earlier comics but it doesn't try to be Christopher Reeves. It might not be a perfect graphic novel series for everyone because you'll see filler and some family focusing parts; look, you can't have continuous shit smacking action. I was impressed with how the writing smuggled Superman back into print! You have to roll with the story.

When You Think About It...

This kryptonian is the last person you would want to seduce your wife or girlfriend. He's got a perfect masculine form, most earth women fall at his feet and he can fly. I mean, you can't pick a fight with him because he's stronger than anything you can see. But he wouldn't, he's a good guy!

In the New 52 there was a thing between him and Wonder woman, but that was all retconned into something that never happened. You see, what makes Superman so good is his high morality, his extremely selfless nature. He's unlikely to have dodgy images on his hard drive or snort anything in a dodgy shitter. The man is a long suffering prime specimen of virtue, which despite sounding boring, makes him a champion we need in our fantasy world! 

We are essentiallly viewing the future miles down the road in a possible comic creation still straining its neck nodding to the 80s movie. SPOILERS: Clark Kent and Louis Lane lost everything, and went into hiding. After surviving on an alien planet during the convergence event they finally arrived on the New 52 version of earth. It was yet another parallel world for them, not their own. It already had a Superman of its own who was a bit of a tit! Isn't that a mad premise? Clark remains in the shadows and focuses on his family, but he had to make himself available to assist if needed he couldn't be a cop-out. END OF SPOILER. 

Confusing Stuff and Underwear

If you liked Superman as a kid, you really should read these. Admittedly, it can be a confusing story if you dont follow a savvy reading order. I recommend starting with the New 52 death of Superman. However, those Iconic red trunks and all that old school hero get-up eventually return, in the end—a nod to the character's rich historical legacy. It's different with Batman because. . . well, realistically, there has been a glut of underwear-free batman movies since 1989.

The artwork is eye candy and compliments the enjoyable read, providing vivid colors that vitalise the dynamic angles in various action scenes. I love how the art conveys the feeling of being high as Superman takes off. Sadly there is more than just the one artist. I still found myself wondering how he managed to father a child with Louis Lane on the first place: a strand of this Kryptonians hair can hold a ton, his sneeze can blow over a car, when he flicks a peanut it's as deadly as gun shot, so how could he fornicate with a fragile earth woman without blowing her head off? 

Critics and Naysayers

SPOILER: The introduction of Mr. Oz was a bit of DC sneakery. There is a lot of that in this series. He was huge a misdirection from the upcoming Watchmen event that overshadowed every Rebirth publication. This mysterious mass manipulator from behind the scenes, was a cool addition to Superman lore. END OF SPOILER. 

Of course there are people who moaned about Superman's so-called diluted issue, but, in comparison, Green Lantern's New 52 and Rebirth make this Superman look astounding in comparison! Traditionally, the man of steel is hope and a symbol who inspires everyone - exactly what it says on the tin. This Clark Kent, (in hiding), is plagued by doubt after the generic bland convergence story arc. Okay, yes, he witnessed the death of that worlds version of Superman, insecurity haunted him after super criminals came for his son. We see his human side.

If classic Superman is the fully restored optimal version of himself, Clark is not quite A1 for much of his story. He's had to learn why his kryptonian qualities weakened, and so, this gives rise to his family priorities. Sadly, there is no stupid marital bickering over things like the correct method to boil an egg, or you know, maybe disapproval of Louis wanting more filler? Either way, we would all love his powers! I'd be straight on the worlds strongest man show just to demoralise those giants. 

Verdict. 8/10

In these comics he starts out as more of a Super-bearded-man, the husband, the dad, son and friend, maybe more real than the action figure he has been before. That is refreshing. Nothing is more fitting than a family for Superman; sadly however, this fatherly take didnt convince writers to let our iconic and unwavering beacon fart on his son once or twice, or belch at the dinner table - dropping a dumb gaff to his wife would've gone done well. That's what most real dads do, or is that just me? 

Wonder Woman vs Aquaman

DC Rebirth: The Aquaman and Wonder woman

4 to 6 min read

I went through a massive phase of reading heroic and epic graphic novels, and when I look at my shelf I can recall every story. The full set of Aquaman, and the six or seven of Wonder woman's DC Rebirth graphic novels I have really hit the spot. I have found much to admire with the works of Dan Abnett, there were, however, some elements that fall somewhat short of the mark.

Rucka's take on Wonder woman was so welcome, a great return to the Amazon's original pre-new 52 character. In this collection, Diana struggles to figure out what is going on in her life, she is troubled, bordering on feeling mentally ill. This was a humbling read and quite relatable. Especially as so many of us will experience poor mental health at some point in our lives. Her mind, as challenged as it was, didn't slow down her protective nature which propelling her story forward. She's still a badass!

As always, heroism, girl power and honour sits at the heart of this run. Her self-discovery was the big sell for me. The spectacular art by Liam Sharp and Nicola Scott illustrates the magnificence and strength of Themyscira and its people. The likes of Wonder woman and Aquaman differ somewhat to The Flash, Cyborg, Lantern, Batman and Superman who have similarity with Hermes, Hephaestus, Hades and Zeus. (Lantern has no hellenic equivalent). However, Wonder woman and Aquaman on the other hand, are linked to these ancient cultures. Wonder woman is thousands of years old; I find this idea has a quality about it, as well as how America has taken her under it's wing. 

Disappointment lingered around the pacing of the Rebirth story, which, I agree, felt slow at times. Personally, her self-discovery warranted more drama, regaining her memory never seemed to convey how much more amazed she should have been; there was no culture shock with themescyra or a tasty climatic resolution, which I craved. The Amazon Princess has limited depth, and her relationship with Steve Trevor was a small offering. 

With Aquaman we see the writing talent of Dan Abnett, the guy who wrote Ravenor for Warhammer 40k. This was a breath of fresh air. Abnett's Arthur Curry/Aquaman, was brilliantly introduced and marketed to the reader. He re-branded those micky-taking tropes we see about Aquaman on-line and presents the reader with a plausible alternative. 

This printed version of Aquaman resembles the film, however, it is better. For instance, we see Arthur struggles to balance his kingly  duties with his loyalty to the surface world. These Rebirth publications are way more political than the Jason Momoa's and Amber Heard alternative.

However, some critics have noted that Aquaman's Rebirth series can feel overly serious at times, but I think Abnett was wise. The writer's exploration of Atlantean politics and culture made the interpersonal relationships more imersive for me, this doesn't work for everyone. As expected. We are all different. 

I suppose, while both Wonder Woman and Aquaman are enjoyable reads, they do have their flaws; many of these comic books do. If we consider that many hit the 7 out of 10 mark on goodreads, it isn't bad going!

 

The Button DC

Batman/The Flash: The Button

5 min read

The Button is a DC Rebirth graphic novel, written by Tom King. The Rebirth series follows the new 52 timeline. I recommend it, straight up. The story follows two alluring archetypes of the comicbook world, Batman and The Flash, who are investigating a strange anomaly; the smiley face Watchmen button, recovered from a wall in the Batcave! 

Two detective types who dress up to fight crime. One is super-human and the other is a resourceful, well disciplined sociopath with a sense of justice. It works! I never liked tje treadmill to be honest but this version of The Flash is the best and the artwork is a belter! Time travel and alternate universes have been done many times, but doing it well is what matters. 

 

We always compare one superhero to another, Batman and The Flash in combat would end terribly quickly—no human human can randomly defend against such speed! On the other hand, who cares? Batman comics are much better and that is where it counts! The Flash and Batman both have fantastic suites, especially in this graphic novel. Fans often like superheroes to be muscular hard men in costumes with a mask, with beautiful females scantily clad with a whip and a bursting cleavage and short skirt. 

Hades and Hermes have been transcoded into modern comic book writing. The annoying thing here is that my favourite character would be extremely hard pressed and would have to prepare way in advance to stand a chance in any altercation with most meta humans, especially The Flash, Superman or Cyborg, but also Aquaman and Wonder woman. It always comes down to the smashy smashy doesn't it? Well, it shouldn't be the case because the stories are more than that these days. This is a detective story gone mad. 

The mutual respect of both men is in their blah blah blah, shared purpose, and a bit of banter! Great. We know and expect the comradery and chemistry, which, I MUST say, is better than that dog awful flash flick where they ruined Keatons Batman. In this, both men bring their own investigative skillset to the story: a rush of comic book enthusiasts ordered this the very micro-second it was officially released purely and only, one hundred percent to see the blue Manhattan chap and the unfolding of the Doomsday Clock story. Ha! It was just a teaser! The watchmen never appeared and everyone was like: 

'Well, 'I'm sure they said we'd see the watchmen crossover, ah well. . . it was a cool run, yeah a really cool run!' 

'But it was a crossover! It featured the badge, that pin, that the comedian wore and we made a few other references, but it was really a Flash and Batman crossover: Bat-bloke Brucie and his speedy mate, Baz. Sorry.' 

'Oh. . . alright then.' 

 

The New 52 Flash

The Flash/Barry Allen has so much potential. 

5 to 7 min read

The New 52 eight graphic novel Flash set, was written by Francis Manapul and Brian Buccellato. Of course, it had it's fair share of praise and criticism, but I enjoyed most of them like satisfying relieving dump of an evening—it makes you feel lighter. The art style stands out because of Manapul and Bucellato; it wasn't amazing. 

It reminded me of that bloody television show: It started out promising and I was pulled in, and it began flirting with some comic themes! Honestly, everything really was hunky-dory, until Mark Hamil rocked up, the yellow bloke returned and it gradually degraded into one of the cringiest comic-to-television disappointments I've ever seen! They destroyed Flashpoint; then the Flash movie did exactly the same. Ezra Miller doesn't even slightly resemble comic-book Barry! 

Anyway, the later Manapul & Buccellato storylines fumbled with the ball a bit, but it is no where near as bad as that televised monstrosity! That being said, for some unknown reason, I enjoyed those cheesey bad guys, The Rogues. I shouldn't have, but I did. They are god awful character designs that are so far removed from a criminal you would think they were designed by the most elite pampered person in the world who has never watched the news. Either way, these characters did fit in quite well with the spin off, the Forever Evil story which ran later. 

Yes, some of these storylines are well written and quite detailed. It would've been enjoyable to see more of Barry Allen's crime scene work and street level investigation, this stuff compliments his justice league collegue the Batman. His down-to-earth-level of superhero work is more raw and more believable than the far fetched tomfoolery of psychic gorilla's, weather rod wielding villainy and that type of tongue in cheek narrative you might find yourself forgiving as you read. However, it slightly connects to the dark world of Watchmen. 

You might like Francis Manapuls Flash. As reading goes, I recommend pretending Flashpoint is the first book, read it, and then, I would pretend the New 52 Justice League is the second book. That's before I'd start the first four or five graphic novels of the Manapul New 52 set. Once accustomed with those, I recommend exploring the first few of The Flash Rebirth volumes and conclude with Batman/Flash The Button. 

Barry Allen has his issues and a strange life, but he certainly isn't a very complex character—he's just the readers guide. Yeah, not just a protagonist. Not many Flash publications have immersed me into the main characters rich history nor put me into his life. The books have, on the other hand, taken me into his situations and conflict, I reinforce what I said: The Flash feels like a guide and pretty level headed, shallow, ready salted person I cannot resonate with much. 

If we ignore the shortcomings, he is great in the comic book Justice League. However, The New 52, Flash graphic novel set is a series that has its ups and downs. The concept of a speedster is a tricky one to wrestle with, given how unrealistically powerful this meta human must be. 

With him on the team they should never lose a fight—he's faster than light. I have to ignore the physics if I want to enjoy Flash stories. This is when we see writers act like apologetics by dulling down superhero powers to more acceptable. 

While the over all idea of The Flash is definitely not perfect, there's no denying that he's also a character worth developing properly in his own right. Batman had a scowling Michael Keaton, the brutish Ben Atflick and the husky voiced Christian Bale; all brilliant in their own way!

Barry Allen in print, is blonde haired and blue eyed, an athletic looking man. He's quite level headed given his forensic science interests and he works as a CSI to vindicate his father. Ezra Miller and John Wesley Shipp didn't come close to The Barry Allen found in our graphic novels, except, maybe for Grant Gustin. What do you think? 

Watchmen Noir

Watchmen in Black and White... 

7 to 9 min read

It's about time I wrote a little something about a graphic novel that made waves, not only in my life, but also in the entire comic book world back in the day. Obviously it's Watchmen. I built that up pointlessly didn't I? If you're not familiar with the graphic novel or the comic book genre, here's a brief overview: Watchmen was written by a wizard called Alan Moore, the legend behind swamp thing, V for Vendetta and From Hell, a beautiful read! It was illustrated by Dave Gibbons, who did Rogue Trooper and The Originals. Watchmen was originally published in 1986 and has since become iconic. 

When I was a child Watchmen would have been way too advanced for me. They looked the part, but I would never have considered them as 'proper superheroes' like Spiderman or Captain America. It's a pleasure to digest a mature themed comic book world. Trying to scrape some sort of enjoyment from modern comics when you reach your forties is like thumbing across into the meaty bits only to find it's all soft. You might try to convince yourself it's working, by appeals to the nostalgia of youth, but that never compensates for the intelligent stimulating goodies you need!

Just in case you did not know, be warned, the Watchmen universe is cynical, dark, political and very gritty. The setting of a story following a group of retired group of superheroes, whose interests unite them once again to investigate the murder of one of their own! Along the way, they uncover a conspiracy that threatens to destroy the world as they know it. A great premise and it flows well.

Watchmen Noir is only one of the many versions of Watchmen graphic novels on the market. 'Before Watchmen' came out, a prequel set of comics that telling the origins and backstories—the reviews weren't great. I never bothered to collect them. In general many spin-offs detract from a very well made original story. Sad. 

Watchmen Noir is a lovely hardcover, black and white edition, that does retain the very noir detective feel it wants. The story was a pleasure to initially read. However, without colour, I got confused once or twice with minor visual references to the plot. Watchmen is a page turner, the intrigue saturates its many characters; combine that with the heavy hardcover format, it brings substance everytime you hold its hard-edged spine.

The film version closely recreates numerous iconic images and panels from the graphic novel, but it goes its own way with other areas such as its different ending, slightly different characters but the graphic novel holds it's own with that dark atmosphere and feeling of threat. 

I was so excited with the big HBO Watchmen Show they announced years ago. All the right words like 'critically acclaimed' were said so I watched it and I was totally confused. It was supposed to be a sequel to the original comic, no, I can't accept nothing but the doomsday clock as the sequal to the original comic. As always, the comic was a hundred times better! As I said: a spin-off that detracted. 

Doomsday clock was the cherry on this cake. It was great to see the Flash, Batman and Superman, part of something with the likes of Dr Manhattan, Rorschach and Ozymandias. I am biased, a fan. 

If you want start enjoying graphic novels then I do – as you might have noticed – recommend reading Watchmen. It's a decent starting point, if you like it, try DC rebirth or DC Black Label. If that's not your thing, explore non-superhero stuff like Preacher, Transmetropolitan, Maus or Sandman. 

 

Is The Supernatural Real? Are Spirits Around Us?

Invisible Spirit and the Empty Room

Have Ghosts Stopped Wearing Sheets Now? 

6 min read 

What’s the difference between an invisible, intelligent, non-material, non-verifiable presence, and an invisible, intelligent, non-material, non-verifiable presence that has decided to pop out for a bit of fresh air? Nothing, they are indistinguishable to us. 

Identify the Problem

There could be something beyond our human scope, but no human could detect this type of presence anyway, right? People do aimlessly debate the claims of such invisible, undetectable, non-material presences until the cows come home—there’s no proof, they’re undetectable! Undetectable, indeed; until the gifted or the ordained claim to see the presences, which nullifies what the spirit is supposed to be! Any analytical atheist would agree, that the simplest explanation is most likely the case, as with Ockham's Razor. Why bother trying to communicate with an empty room?

Taking The Jungian Perspective 

What authority has set the invisible, intelligent, non-material, non-verifiable presence, 'breed standard'? The answer needs no mentioning. This spirit in the room resonates with Carl Jungs archetypes of both the Shadow and the Anima/Animus, the latter emerges in dreams, visions, or inner experiences influencing perceptions, taking on an almost 'other' quality​. Similarly, the Shadow is repressed within all of us, we have our own. A dark influencing force, almost ghostly or paranormal that also provides that sense of 'other' that we can't fully explain. Now, we should consider what paranormal activity everyday people have claimed to have experienced.

Anecdotal Reports

People have been experiencing strange presences, ghosts, elves and poltergeists (that we often call the paranormal now) since the dawn of history—in doing so, suggests these presences cannot be invisible, intelligent, non-material, and non-verifiable. Only a week ago, my boy said the rocking chair started rocking by itself, so he filmed it. The kitchen is a tad odd during the evenings; we have no idea why things have unnaturaly fallen off the kitchen surface or what makes noise in there.

The Mechanics Behind The Moans

In other parts of the house, family members have seen strange shadow people, and shadow insects, that bear no religious or spiritual significance to anything. As well as that, we’ve noticed unexpected smells of tobacco and aftershave—we don’t smoke. I won't get into the ghost stories told by the extended family about their houses. Many of us tend to rationalise a creepy incident away as an over active imagination or we ignore it, because these things don't follow logic. My point is; any moaning ghost will need a voice box to moan, just as our rocking chair poltergeist will require both energy and matter to rock it—the breed standard is all wrong!

Science and the Paranormal 

The absence of scientific evidence for a spirit signifies very little; every culture across the globe has its own criteria for what their spooks are supposed to be, a djinn, a fetch, a banshee, poltergeist or a dybbuk—Japan and China have countless types of ghosts!

Phenomenal Relativity of Interpretation

When dogmas emerge, people start to expect their spirits to behave like a class X, Y or Z, but the paranormal isn’t like that, it’s defined as unexpected, not predictable or explainable. There is no stream of constant paranormal evidence that science can readily study. You can’t do it. These weird happenings aren't timetabled like the number nine bus. It's similar to ball lightning or England winning the world cup.

How We See Things

Stephen Hawking could not see his black holes; a problem with detectability existed for him. Perhaps a similar situation exists with spirits; you see, in the end, Hawking saw the gravitational effect of a black hole moving the cosmic bodies that surrounded them, maybe occultists do something similar with presences? Like the cosmic community, many people have been affected by unseen forces of a paranormal kind.

Any discrepancies between an invisible, intelligent, non-material, non-verifiable presence, and one that has buggered off somewhere, comes down to choice; self trickery, possibly a deliberate decision to join a collective of believers. 

To Wrap it Up

Now, on the other hand: what is the difference between an invisible, intelligent, non-material, non-verifiable presence, and a direct experience of an unexplained phenomena shared with a co-worker? Witness accounts often involve seeing, hearing, smelling, as well as feeling presences or ghosts, a physicalism, which not always invisible, can they hold a substantial presence. The spirit in the room is the most compelling character of all! 

The New 52 Batman

The Simple Misogynist

Is It Really That Simple?

4 min read

I can't remember what I was doing the last time I was called a 'simp' by my teenage boy; it definitely had something to do with me helping my better half. I wasn't really taken aback by the cheeky bugger, given his sense of humour. Who cares, I thought, I was being called an NPC or one of those sims from that domestic simulation game, The Sims? Well, I had it all wrong and, days later I found myself lecturing the poor chap about the shortcomings of incels and the malignant narcissism of that Andrew-S*dding-Tate bloke who beats women or something? Admittedly, I was quite impassioned and I criticised him just for entertaining that horsesh*t in the first place.

Of course, I felt guilty for overly stressing my displeasure. I failed to give him his due credit for not being pulled into it; he was just curious, because he found their views stupid. 

A spectrum of misogyny exists across social media, it marginalises women, transgender people, slams homosexuality, basically everything except this cult logic of being a 'real' manly man. The weak herds of unique sheep follow. A social contagion of this kind will never be good us. 

Anyway, looking at the insult: 'a simp' is internet slang, hurled at submissive men who offer so-called 'excessive' affection to women—usually a wife or partner in hope of obtaining sexual favours! It comes from simple/simpleton. These 'macho men' well on the misogyny spectrum, call any guy a 'simp' for not embodying the idealism of the superior sex. Yes, it really is that simple, or is it? 

Certain men fit this definition well. For instance, imagine all the sons and daughters who have faced being fleeced out of their inheritance by their fathers gold-digging fiancé. These things happen, it's a true story. Frustrated as any offspring would be in these powerless scenarios; patriarchal ignorance always plays the key role in this notion of a simp. 

The best of us make mistakes, our smartest can be deceived, even Andrew Tate himself. However, in my own family, there are weak men. Not all guy's can be strong. Steven, my brother in law—I shall call him this for privacy reasons—is dominated by his wife. He works a full week plus overtime; groggy unchanged toddlers are thrown at him the second he walks through his front door, his dinner is never cooked, and the house is always a shambles. This 'simp' is expected to cook, clean and look after the children, while his wife enjoys her leisurely pursuits. Now, it's an observed truth that all couples find their own areas of dominance and submission, it's natural. My better half is like a practical genius with DIY, and to be honest, I have no idea what I bring to the table!

kids'll buy into this internet dogma, just as they lapped up dubstep!

However, Steven, is burning out. His partner is visibly parasitising off of him, and to his own disservice, he allows it. Even after she committed adultery and told him about it, he apologised to her! Sharpened his carnal skillset between the sheets, wined and dined the woman, and then, he let her sod of to Magaluf with her friends. We were all baffled, because he is so desperate to keep the horrible woman—anathema to any 'alphas' out there. It continues to this day; she was found out again! covertly dating while he babysat for her. Trying out the word 'simp' to describe the men in this blog feels wrong, regardless of how accurate it might appear by definition. 

Omar Moran would also be called a simp, he has been married all of my life. A spirited man, unique, enjoys his tomfoolery, somewhat highly strung, hardly a rocket scientist, but not an ignoramus. Above all, he means well and, he's just like Steven with his wife. Jill his partner permanently forbade him from attending church. Omar is known as being, 'under-the-thumb' but it goes further than this. His wife, Jill, always has the final say. This dialogue is based on something I witnessed at a friends house:

Omar Moran: I do fancy some chips from the chippy, I'm starving! 

Mick: And me, come on, we'll walk over and fetch some. 

Omar Moran: Yeah, kebab meat and chips'll do nicely. What you having, Jill? (asking his other half)

Jill Moran: I'm okay, not very hungry. 

Omar Moran: Oh, uh, I think I'll leave it then, you know, Jill's not having anything, so uh. . . 

Mick: What?! But, I thought, you, er said you fancied. . . aren't you hungry anymore?

It's a given fact, alpha types who bully women are mentally weak; submission is a strength, and the submissive allow people to be dominant, I suppose. A line exists between the doormat and the gentleman. However, it's up to every one of us to challenge this stupid reasoning that attacks the dynamics of relationships.  

It's a different kettle of fish when your partner's a psycho!