The Resurrection Story We Never Mention! What is more plausible, an executed religious leader who fronted a growing movement, abruptly raised from the dead? Or a group of his followers hiding his body to claim the same thing? This topic resonates with me because of the intellectual biasing I've seen from my encouragable family members and the fact I go obsessed with religion when I'm turning kooky. People throw all common sense out of the window just to believe biblical narrative. Thick books with stained glass windows on the covers, exist, sitting on the bookshelves of gray haired men discussing such pointless topics; issues which can never be resolved. The Empty Tomb: Was Jesus Resurrected? No. Obviously not. Don't be silly. However, the impossibility of it is never sufficient in breaking the paranormal premises disguised as some variant of academia. I advise leaning on the laws of nature and medical science, but folks are strange! 'No this is nonesense! It says
Annoying Cosmological Arguments That Promote Religion: it's not quite evidence. Essentially, debates like the Kalam cosmological argument or the watchmaker analogy, typically place emphasis on annoying claims that play on intuition which religious and cult leaders have often utilised. For example, since Christianity arrived in Europe people started crediting God for anything good that happened in their lives and the Devil was the cause of the bad. Modern religious minded folk are doing the same to this day! The evangelist, William Lane Craig , stressed that it's obvious how everything with a beginning, was, in fact, caused by an almighty Abrahamic god, or likewise, they attribute marvels of nature to intelligent design. It's never ending: what always follows is that God did it if it is good. Even the cosmological assertion that the universe must originate with some kind of non-material, all amazing God who existed before time itself came to be, is realistically, the same