The Thing With Non-Violence... Peace Keepers and Piece Takers 4 min read A famous messiah once proclaimed, ‘ He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword .’ We all know the phrase, along with his calls for peace, like ‘turn the other cheek.’ Yet, paradoxically, his apostles met violent deaths. That outcome is the point of this post. Yes, so it was faith and not the taking up of arms that led to so many brutal endings. The early brand of spiritual pacifism ignited societal persecution against Christianity, but also other similar non-violent ideologies. Those scripture-based beliefs and philosophies were not common among the Germanic Pagan tribes, who in contrast, valued loyalty to their warlord, bravery in combat , and vengeance, for example. Piety to them was martial discipline and defending their people. They embraced war and viewed readiness to fight as a deterrent. These people also enjoyed what money could bring instead of denying it. It is strange how Ch...
My Approach To Creativity
4 min read
When we read a book such as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein we will conjure up various images of Victor Frankenstein, even though the classic black and white film used a mad scientist archetype, which is not in the novel at all. There's nothing wrong with borrowing this popular movie icon to visualise Shelley's words. Victor Frankenstein, (like many fictional literary characters) have to form into your concept of what they might be; we take on the job of visualising or bringing characters to life through interpretation—this is where the work of the author ends and where we begin.
The cartoonist and illustrator does exactly the same with character creation or the composition of visual comedy. Symbols, pop culture, stereotypes, tropes and memes are all tools. We all saw the caricatures of Trump that saturated Instagram, especially the tantruming child or cry baby? This man has been symbolised, mocked and postured more than most political figures I can think of, to be honest.
It's the various combinations or ways of depiction, the construal and style are way more important than the subject. Countless techniques are within you, waiting: you can break the conceptual art perimeters. I love how cartoonists unapologetically make piss taking and fuckwittery an art.
At the start of my drawing processes, there is always a haze, that blurry raw idea, the gist of what I want to say. If I wanted to make a visual joke about MPs who plan to cut disability benefits for vulnerable people, I'd immediately start by exploring imagery based on common stereotypes. The demonisation conveyed in the art taints the targets actions—sadly some internet platforms ban you for it!
Before Anthony Hopkins immortalised Hannibal Lecter back in the nineties, people read about him first. His presence and appearance was upto the reader. He was multifaceted in his written form (he had crimson brown eyes and extra fingers in the book).
Realistic cartoons take longer to do, and they can detract from the mood or the joke itself! Maybe this is why Calvin and Hobbes aren't decorated with ultra realistic facial features. Well designed bur simple creations let your imagination do a little work.
.jpg)