Can We Prevent The Ruin of the West?

How Puppet Masters Keep Us Fighting Each Other

You really can see sad income inequality in the UK. Not to put a downer on this before even writing it but, most of us have little trust in the system - it's not just because of the failing services or the country's political polarization either. Nope, it's the social cohesion, unity's gone. Doesn't it make you think the entire West is undergoing a collapse? Okay, enough of that! But yeah, it really is going down.

The Way Forward: Stop Playing Their Game

7 min read 

Let's cut the bollocks and get to the simple truth. The average person in Britain, America, China, Russia, or anywhere else wants the same basic things - safety, prosperity, dignity, and peace for their families. 14.4 million people in the UK live in poverty, and 13.8% of households are food insecure, see here. These are real problems, not culture war nonsense.

The average British family wants:

1. Affordable food shopping
2. Bills they can actually pay
3. Safe streets for their kids
4. Decent schools
5. Maybe a holiday that doesn't require selling a kidney! 

The system is dividing us and it serves the interests of fewer, but yet, more powerful human beings. We know some of those in positions of power dissociate from us; they convince themselves that normal moral constraints don't fully apply to their 'necessary' work of managing the populace. Look at the psychology behind shit like Tony Blair's Dossier for WMD, America's Project Northwoods, MKUltra, Operation Crossroads and our ugly Post Office Horizon Scandal. 

The Sage vs. Modern Rage

Right, let's start with something that'll ruffle more feathers than December's turkey market. Christian patriots waving flags and invoking Jesus for Britain? They've got the wrong bloke entirely.

For the sake of 'keeping it real,' the historical Jesus (you know what I mean), I'm not talking about the third century ancient fan edited version! This gentleman lived in Galilee - during his ministry it came under Northern Palestine, a multicultural spot. Yeah, strange how Jesus was Palestinian but also a Jewish man (not being political). The geezer was a very spiritual figure, operating under a brutal Roman occupation. On that note, we shouldn't deny humanism's contributions to British morality, as well as, other things like stoicism, or the old golden rule, our morality is not exclusive to the church, civilised ethics existed BCE. 

• Nazareth was a tiny village of maybe 400 people at a guess, where Aramaic-speaking Jews rubbed shoulders with Greek-speaking gentiles

• Jesus taught down in Capernaum by the Sea of Galilee - fishing town full of tax collectors, Roman soldiers, and mixed ethnicities

• His message was dead simple: Love God, love your neighbour, and put compassion into action, especially for the marginalised.

What Jesus never said was: 'Wave flags for our country' or 'countrymen with opposing views are the enemy!'

Regardless of what his prosecution charge was supposed to be; he didn't use threatening language against Pilate or raise an army against Rome; go and check, search for Biblical and historical sources for aggression aimed at Rome. If you start stripping away the theological embellishments you'll find a more grounded historical figure; someone more likely to ask today's Christian nationalists to chill out a bit.

We rebranded the guy into a white European and the cross has long since been an idol used for political control and influence. 

The Puppet Masters: Meet Your Overlords

While the internet argues what a woman is or debates if illegal immigration is wrong, real families are wondering how they'll pay the gas bill. The same elite networks that have been pulling strings for decades are watching us suffer while we pick sides. This post is not about religion and I'm really not trying to promote politics, just how it maintains their illusion. 

Bohemian Grove: Where Power Goes Spooky

Bare with the 'tinfoil hat' optics a moment and picture every Republican president since 1923, plus various influential figures from the Supreme Court, corporate world giants, and media moguls, right? Thousands of these powerhouses have been gathering in California redwoods to perform a ritual every twelve months! It even has a name: 'Cremation of Care.' They literally burn away all cares about the outside world in a weird ritual symbolically akin to baptism in front of a giant owl statue. Yeah, okay, it sounds loony tunes, so what? The theatrics are distracting.

That owl? People say it represents Athena, also known as: Venus, Ishtar, Isis, Inanna, Lilith, the Morning Star, closely associated with Lucifer! But really, whether you take that literally or metaphorically, the message has led to mountains of speculative accusations from planning world domination, satanism to child sacrifice. Why? Well, world elites who castaway normal moral constraints for a 'greater good' is sensational and interesting. Of course, it implies the nefarious, cognitive empathy over emotional hindrance, and it's creepy. Still, fact or fiction, owls and robes aren't the sodding danger!!

The Manhattan Project was planned there! A fact. Nuclear weapons. Decided by blokes who'd just cremated their cares!

The grove the Bohemian Club's property. The Bohemians are part of a larger Bilderberg Merry-Go-Round of conspiracies, likely because it's the same faces, just different venues. So what about conspiracy? When the world's most powerful all gather under complete media blackout it's not to play a Street Fighter championship, is it? 

Speaking candidly, suspicion and conspiracy theory is divided by a line of stigma! Any posthumous allegation or unusual witness statement will usually turn to jelly and just sit there, maybe giving the occasional wobble. A grey area. Paul Bonacci openly said he was a victim at Bohemian Grove in Yorkshire TV's 'Conspiracy of Silence,' but after being convicted himself his claim was discredited. He still wobbles occassionally. It's worth asking yourself: Would new suspicions of child trafficking end up being down prioritised in the Grove today, considering the reputation and historical sensationalism? Absolutely. Does it mean child abuse has always been unlikely to happen there? Duh, no. Does it detract from what is really happening? Yes.

The following three men frequented The Bilderberg Group Meetings and Bohemian Grove. I hope it conveys power and attitude:

• David Rockefeller: Trilateral Commission founder. Western plus Japan cooperation and diplomacy

• Henry Kissinger: Escalated Vietnam War and Negotiated its end. Won a Nobel Peace Prize. Supported Authoritarian Regimes. 

• Zbigniew Brzezinski: The man who authorized CIA support for Afghan fighters against the Soviets, contributing to later extremist groups

The Division Machine: Who Profits Most?

Here's the thing that'll bake your noodle: division is how we are controlled. Algorithms across the internet are great for elite networks which seem to 'Cambridge Analytica' us all as either 'woke communist traitors' or 'fascist racist bigots.'

It's the nature of the beast; algorithms are already designed to promote content that gets the most engagement, and nothing gets a reaction like a political screaming match! It's a self-perpetuating machine managed by social engineers. It is so easy.

This isn't totally organic. Normal people aren't naturally this fucking mental. But division keeps us from asking awkward questions like 'Why are we giving millions away in foreign aid when my nan has to use a food bank?'  

The Enemy From Outside

We all know it's mostly China and Russia. The U.S. defence budget alone is over $886 billion a year. The top five U.S. defence contractors make tens of billions in revenue!

Nowadays, China will likely spy on us, threaten our media because of its perceived unsuitable coverage, or hit our governance with cyber-disruption. Jaguar Land Rover and M&S were hit recently, NHS a few years ago.

However, long before we nicked that Russian spying on Queen Elizabeth II, they had already been chipping away at us for some time. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion the book Russia fabricated in 1903 has spread globally. The Nazi party made use of it, look how that turned out. Then there was the cyber-attacks, not forgetting 'Doctors Plot' in the fifties and the 'Salisbury poisoning' in 2018 and the 'Litvinenko poisoning' in 2006.

The Manufactured Patriots: When Grassroots Aren't So Grassroots

Coming back to the sizable patriotic demonstrations we've been seeing, don't they have suspiciously good organisation and funding? Worth asking: who benefits from channelling genuine grievances into convenient political movements?

Take a political movement that paints itself as being outside the system. It's fighting for us, the people, not the establishment. Be that as it is; sound systems, massive screens, celebrities, and even a cooky billionaire?! Elon Musk made sure to push his grievance about 'impending violence'. 

Who paid for all that bollocks? Why is a man worth a quarter of a trillion dollars leading a so-called 'grassroots' movement? Really? Why did people listen to Katie Hopkins, Why did their message sound so tired and condescending? 

We're told to see these protests as the people's voice, but it's not a conspiracy theory to wonder why a figure with his own space exploration program is involved with left vs Right wing tensions in UK politics? 

Apparently, according to various people I've listened to in life, the textbook manipulation to watch out for is distraction; using incidents, media or authentic movements to redirect attention away. Even Greco-Roman power used controlled opposition that served them while appearing to challenge it. Julius Caesar's First Triumvirate, for example. 

Is that it? Hell no! Debt trap diplomacy using trade and loans for dependency, resource and supply route control, infiltrating education, manipulation of supply vulnerabilities, tech theft. Today we see hybrid warfare (cyber, economic, information warfare) alongside traditional field combat its multi-factored and leaders have to listen to elite multinationals who bring yet another dimension. 

Labour's Grooming Gang Cover-Up: Sacrifice in Action

Nothing shows human sacrifice like Labour's handling of industrial-scale child abuse. I'm not thinking alters and daggers, but a sacrifice to the gods of woke only to simply avoid appearing racist. Official inquiries and the government jiffer-jaff is well known now. 

Conclusion

Here's the really sinister bit: these secret groups and networks don't just take a slice of power, they pay for it through transgressional bonding, designed to forge unbreakable loyalty. They can also operate in religious circles and cults, let's ignore the prophetical red heifers and end-time jackanory plots in the Middle East

Bohemian Grove: Mock human sacrifice rituals and unsubstantiated allegations of child trafficking

Skull And Bones: Secret oaths formed by world leaders, media moguls, business tycoons leading to form life long bonds

Epstein network: Documented blackmail through sexual compromise

Bilderberg Group: Alleged coordinated deception of entire populations

Group of Thirty (G30) Ultra Elite Bank Governors who have control of world economics

Is there a class of wrong minded people psychologically capable of doing the fubar? This isn't Christian, Secular or Islamic, neither is it every day common decency. So how do we, the ordinary people build enough power to challenge things? As we know, voting every few years isn't cutting it. Ignore the radicals, the fringe, the extreme and be compassionate. Unite. Make politics boring again. 

Is Britains DEI Dodgy?

Britain's £50 Million Diversity Question

The UK has been coughing up over £50 million a year on diversity, equity and inclusion programs (DEI). Here's an uncomfortable question: Are they actually working or are we throwing bundles of cash at a fire only to make flames?

This isn't about whether DEI principles matter—of course they do. I'm just asking if it's wise to splash out on morally prestigious awards when other options exist. 

5 min read

The Financial Investment

The numbers are getting harder to ignore:

Local councils: Research from the TaxPayers' Alliance show the cost of DEI roles almost doubled from just over £12 million in 2020/21 to almost £23 million in 2022/23!

Government: Diversity managers often earn in excess of £40k, while the rest of us are expected to accept austerity! UK LinkedIn data from 2020 shows almost twice as many diversity and inclusion workers as many other countries.

What is the Research Saying? 

This is more than just a political talking point for weddings and funerals, the government's own research is sounding the alarm. The official Inclusion at Work Panel report (2024), concluded that many DEI programs are being implemented without any proof that they work, this shows they can be counter-productive! Not good, especially who lost disability benefits. 

Even though employers might want to ‘do the right thing,’ they are ‘resorting to ineffective practices that can be polarising.’ Our own governments research says diversity and inclusion isn't even working. Yet evidently the spending keeps sky rocketting! 

On The Other Hand

The supporters of these programs will say that they tackle hidden prejudices, that change requires sustained investment. Fair enough, if that's how best intentions appear where's the evidence to show how it works?

If we go on research from the likes of the London School of Economics (LSE) we can get some clear facts. In a 2024 study they found that having a diverse workforce is associated with stronger long-term market performance!

The analysis from McKinsey & Company conclude that companies with plenty of women and ethnic minorities will likely bring employers above-average profitability. 

These are valid points. However the question remains: are current DEI methods benefitting the public? Is it doing what it says on the tin? 

Don't be an Appalled Paul

What People Actually Experience:

•  At Work: Despite all the money spent, an Ipsos poll in 2025 uncovered deep divisions in public opinion. While there is widespread support for specific things like flexible working, 36% of Britons believe DEI efforts have ‘gone too far.’ To be fair the view is particularly strong among men (43%), those over 55 (47%), and people from white backgrounds (38%). 

• At University: The anecdotes of ‘walking on eggshells’ and feeling more divided after diversity training are common. 

The focus on demographic differences increases segregation rather than foster genuine integration. Separate ceremonies and support groups for people of different backgrounds still continue! 

The Bigger Picture

These numbers often fail to show real progress. For example, while the Civil Service has increased its number of ethnic minority workers, the number of those workers in the most senior leadership roles still lag behind the overall population. We might argue it demonstrates how programs and higher costs do not always equal better results.

The Self-Perpetuating Problem

Diversity consultation is a big business today. Consultants profit when they find inclusion, diversity and equity problems, and of course, their departments will grow when they document inequality. 

There is financial incentive for peoples problems to continue, not for them to be solved. NHS Individual Placement and Support (IPS) workers are incentivised to find sustainable jobs for the unemployed who may not even be ready for employment!

What Actually Works: A Path Forward

Why should the path to genuine progress be about abandoning the goal of equality? We should shift resources from the more bureaucratic roles to tangible solutions, ones with a proven track record:

•  Address real barriers: For instance, rather than having DEI services, committees and so on, why not pay for a young person from a low-income family to train as a firefighter or a welder? That will attract more diverse individuals from various backgrounds.

• Build shared purpose: Make common goals and shared values count, don't emphasise demographic differences.

•  Measure results: Track real outcomes, promotion rates and pay gap closures.

•  Let relationships develop naturally: When we force interactions they backfire.

The Bottom Line

We've been presented with a system that increases racial and social class awareness while claiming to reduce these things when they don’t. If we want effective DEI support someone should reform it. The stakes are too high for virtue signalling culture.

After years of division, our towns and cities need something that is genuinely effective. Repeating the same thing while expecting different results isn't progressive—it's just expensive madness.

Conclusion

The demand for these DEI services is driven by both corporate and public pressure, but not the proven results we need to drive this forward. DEI is circulating the problems they hope to end, it has created wealthy people another profitable market! 

It's a ‘badge of virtue’ that every company wants to wear. DEI is a strong moral imperative, however, charging money for a training award without knowing whether or not the programs actually work isn't ethical.  

The irony is that DEI services widen inequality gaps, which is classism caught red handed: Professional-class solutions for working-class problems. They entrench the hierarchy further as professional administrators who oversee inequality instead of ending it.